The chargesheet finds that Singh, along side the federation’s assistant secretary Vinod Tomaris summoned to look sooner than an ordeal courtroom on Tuesday.
The panel, consisting of six participants and headed via mythical Indian boxer MC Mary Kom, used to be shaped via the federal government to behavior the investigation. Although the panel submitted its report back to the federal government, it has now not been made public. In their particular person statements, the complainants expressed their trust that the panel displayed a bias in opposition to Singh, who may be a Member of Parliament.
The in depth chargesheet, spanning 1599 pages, contains statements from 44 witnesses and 6 statements from the complainants, that have been recorded below Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
“Even after giving my statement before the (oversight) committee, whenever I visited the federation office, the accused looked at me with distasteful and lustful eyes and made wrong gestures which made me feel insecure,” mentioned one of the most complainants.
“Even the video recording was being switched off and on while I was giving my statement and in spite of my request, the committee did not supply me a copy of my video recording. I fear that my statement may not have been recorded in entirety and may also have been tampered with to protect the accused,” the commentary of the wrestler learn additional.
Another complainant has mentioned that she used to be incorporated as a member of WFI’s sexual harassment committee with out her consent. It is obligatory for all nationwide sports activities federations to ascertain an Internal Complaints Committee to deal with such circumstances.
“I was never issued any formal communication informing me about such approval, nor was any formal communication received by me seeking my approval to be part of the sexual harassment committee of the wrestling Federation of India.
“The accused, in conspiracy with accused No. 2 and different unknown individuals, has intentionally executed this to suppress my voice and allegations towards him. He has, with out my approval or consent, made me a part of the mentioned committee and is now alleging that regardless of being a part of the committee, I’m falsely alleging to be a sufferer myself,” said the complainant.
The complainant also claimed that the oversight panel failed to provide her with the requested recording when she made the demand.
“I had critical doubts that that my commentary on video won’t were recorded in entirety or could have been altered in an strive to offer protection to the accused and thus I asked for a duplicate of the video recording. However, participants of the oversight committee flatly Turned down my request.
The Delhi Police justified their choice to not arrest the accused via declaring that each Singh and Tomar cooperated with the investigation and complied with the regulation.
“Results of digital/electronic devices and exhibits seized and deposited with the concerned Forensic Labs are yet to be received and shall be filed through supplementary police reports. The analysis of requisitioned CDRs, etc., as found appropriate for the purpose of prosecution shall also be submitted expeditiously,” the police mentioned within the chargesheet.