TCS had argued that the district courtroom had didn’t apply america Court of Appeals’ directives when it declined to additional cut back the punitive damages award to between $10 and $25 million. “Because the district court properly justified the $140 million punitive damages award, we affirm,” the Court of Appeals’ order mentioned.
Epic had alleged that TCS and Tata America had accessed its internet portal with out authorization whilst servicing a mutual consumer, after which used this knowledge to broaden their very own aggressive sanatorium control machine instrument.
In the research within the Seventh Circuit Order in July, the courtroom file confirmed “it described how TCS staff—understanding complete neatly that they had been unauthorized to view Epic’s internet portal—intentionally and time and again accessed and downloaded confidential data that epic had spent years creating, after which used that data to try to compete with Epic.”
“The district court also described the steps TCS leadership took to conceal their scheme — disciplining an internal whistleblower, failing to preserve relevant documents, lying when questioned by Epic, and then lying again when questioned under oath. The court described this conduct as “repeated, planned, and cynical.”
The court said that the punitive damages were proportional to the compensatory damages and the harm Epic suffered. TCS had cited various opinions ordering lower awards. The court emphasized that TCS is one of the largest companies in the world and, therefore, only a significant punishment would have a deterrent effect. The court also expressed displeasure at TCS’s “repeated and brazen misconduct.”
An electronic mail despatched to TCS did not elicit a reaction.