BEIJING: Beijing stated Friday that it does no longer ask corporations handy over knowledge accrued in another country, as Chinese-owned TikTok faces requires a ban within the United States.
China “has never and will not require companies or individuals to collect or provide data located in a foreign country, in a way that violates local law”, overseas ministry spokesperson Mao Ning informed a normal briefing.
The Chinese govt “attaches great importance to protecting data privacy”, she stated.
“The US government has so far not provided any evidence that TikTok poses a threat to its national security, but instead has repeatedly made presumptions of guilt and unreasonable suppression” towards the corporate, Mao added.
“We have also noted that some in the US congress stated that seeking a ban of TikTok is a xenophobic political persecution,” she stated.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew confronted relentless wondering from combative US lawmakers on all sides of the political aisle Thursday over the video-sharing app’s alleged ties to China and its risk to teenagers.
The Harvard-educated former banker failed over greater than 5 hours to defuse an existential risk to TikTok because the app seeks to live to tell the tale a White House ultimatum that it both break up from its Chinese possession or be banned within the United States.
“ByteDance is not owned or controlled by the Chinese government and is a private company,” bite informed lawmakers in his opening remarks, regarding TikTok’s China-based mother or father corporate.
“We believe what’s needed are clear transparent rules that apply broadly to all tech companies — ownership is not at the core of addressing these concerns,” Chew added.
At the crux of a lot of the fears over TikTok is a 2017 Chinese legislation that calls for native corporations handy over non-public knowledge to the state whether it is related to nationwide safety.
And in a single specifically heated change Thursday, Chew used to be compelled to recognize that some non-public knowledge of Americans used to be nonetheless topic to Chinese legislation, however insisted that might quickly be modified.
The company additionally stated in November that some staff in China may get entry to European consumer knowledge and admitted in December that staff had used the information to undercover agent on newshounds.
But the gang has insisted that the Chinese govt has no keep an eye on over or get entry to to its knowledge.
China “has never and will not require companies or individuals to collect or provide data located in a foreign country, in a way that violates local law”, overseas ministry spokesperson Mao Ning informed a normal briefing.
The Chinese govt “attaches great importance to protecting data privacy”, she stated.
“The US government has so far not provided any evidence that TikTok poses a threat to its national security, but instead has repeatedly made presumptions of guilt and unreasonable suppression” towards the corporate, Mao added.
“We have also noted that some in the US congress stated that seeking a ban of TikTok is a xenophobic political persecution,” she stated.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew confronted relentless wondering from combative US lawmakers on all sides of the political aisle Thursday over the video-sharing app’s alleged ties to China and its risk to teenagers.
The Harvard-educated former banker failed over greater than 5 hours to defuse an existential risk to TikTok because the app seeks to live to tell the tale a White House ultimatum that it both break up from its Chinese possession or be banned within the United States.
“ByteDance is not owned or controlled by the Chinese government and is a private company,” bite informed lawmakers in his opening remarks, regarding TikTok’s China-based mother or father corporate.
“We believe what’s needed are clear transparent rules that apply broadly to all tech companies — ownership is not at the core of addressing these concerns,” Chew added.
At the crux of a lot of the fears over TikTok is a 2017 Chinese legislation that calls for native corporations handy over non-public knowledge to the state whether it is related to nationwide safety.
And in a single specifically heated change Thursday, Chew used to be compelled to recognize that some non-public knowledge of Americans used to be nonetheless topic to Chinese legislation, however insisted that might quickly be modified.
The company additionally stated in November that some staff in China may get entry to European consumer knowledge and admitted in December that staff had used the information to undercover agent on newshounds.
But the gang has insisted that the Chinese govt has no keep an eye on over or get entry to to its knowledge.